Recent Posts

Observations (post #1)

April 4, 2018, 11:55 am, -10C, clouds: 0/4, wind: 1/4

The study site I have selected is a small marsh known as Pumphouse Pond, fed by McIntyre Creek, coordinates 60.7501, -135.1049, situated behind the Yukon Research Center in Whitehorse, YT. The designation of this marsh is most likely YG parkland. It is approximately 10 acres in size, surrounded by boreal forest and accessible by trails on all sides except the north, where it narrows and runs off into a creek. There is a pumphouse on the west edge where McIntyre Creek empties into the marsh. At this time of year the marsh is frozen and covered in snow, which obstructs observation of the lower levels of flora in and around the body of water except for where the occasional patch has melted through, but surrounding the marsh are trees typical of the boreal forest including Picea glauca, Pinus contorta, Populus tremuloides, Populus balsamifera, and Betula neoalaskana. The understory includes Rhododendron groenlandicum, Rosa acacia, varieties of Salix and Alnus, and others which are at present unidentifiable under the snow. The ground cover includes grasses, sedges, sage, lowbush cranberry, twinflower, and kinnickinnick, though almost all ground is too covered in snow to be observed.

The east bank of the marsh gives way to a steep slope which ascends ~20 meters before resolving into a plateau, while the other borders are characterized by subtly rolling topography. The creek itself flows in from the west, indicating a gentle upward grade. There is a high voltage power line visible to the north of the marsh. A gravel road runs parallel to the southern bank ~50 meters from the water’s edge, not visible from the trail.

Numerous tracks belonging to showshoe hares, red foxes, red squirrels, ravens, and small rodents were observed in the snow. Each of these species is common and abundant in this area. The sounds of 3-4 ravens could be heard to the north edge of the marsh, and a few varieties of birds I cannot at this point identify were singing along the southern edge.

Observations around this site which struck me as interesting include:
-There are two stands of dead trees at the north-west and south-west edges of the marsh. These trees are ~half the height of the live trees which they sit in front of, which appear taller on average than the trees around the rest of the marsh. The relationship between the short dead trees and the taller-than-usual live ones could be explored in light of the shared characteristics of both stand sets (west facing, at the edge of the water, etc).
-While there are many animal tracks near the edges of the marsh, only fox tracks were observed to cut across the middle of the frozen surface. This may suggest an interaction pattern based on feeding relationships.
-Hare tracks tended to follow a distinctive connect-the-dots type pattern from tree to tree for trees with trunks over a certain diameter. Other animal’s tracks seemed to follow trajectories which were more direct, avoiding trees in favour of more continuous movement. I wondered if the pattern of hare movement reflected a predator avoidance strategy or a cold-survival strategy, as the larger trunks were surrounded by wells where reflected heat created potential access points to the subnivean space.

Blog Post 3: Ongoing Field Observations

I had gone to Gambles pond again on March 25 to observe the behaviour of the animals around.

I have decided to focus on 3 species:

The Mallard duck (Anas platyrhynchos)

The Redhead Duck (Aythya americana) 

The Canada Goose (Branta canadensis)

While I may focus more on the Mallard duck – I think that collecting data from the other two species would provide good data for consideration. I am interested in a couple of factors about the ducks in particular. Why do they seem to avoid one section of the pond and do they change how they behave during different times of the day or at different temperatures. As I saw in my previous blog posts, I noticed a small animal that looked like a muskrat swimming around in the shallow section. Perhaps the main reason the ducks are more prevalent in the centre of the pond is to avoid potential predators. However, there is a walking path, and ducks seem to migrate there when people are present. This may be to get food from people. So to investigate I will have to stay away from the edge of the water.

I hypothesize that: Anas platyrhynchos prefer to be in the open of a body of water.

I predict that: The number of Anas platyrhynchos in the middle of the pond will be higher than at the edges.

The predictor variables: land, shallow water with foliage and deep water (categorical).

The response variables: Number of Anas platyrhynchos present (continuous).

Attached are my field book notes: Ongoing Field Observations_Drayden Kopp

Blog Post 2: Sources of Scientific Information

The source of information is from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3798312?origin=crossref

This is an academic peer-reviewed journal article. It is a research article.

The article discusses research methods and uses its own data. It is published into a journal. The guidelines for this journal talk about the peer-review process in detail here:

http://www.nacwg.org/JWMguidelines2011.pdf

A reference to this source:

Martz, G. F. 1967. Effects of Nesting Cover Removal on Breeding Puddle Ducks. The Journal of Wildlife Management 31:236.

Blog Post 1: Observations

The Area I am interested in is Gambles Pond. It is at a public park. The area has a baseball field near the pond and a small path to the edge of the pond. The pond itself has a lot of vegetation. There are a handful of animals present. The pond itself is near a grassland area with rolling hills. There are a few trees and shrubs. Some of the trees may be ornamental. I visited at the start of spring on March 24, 2018. There is still snow present – but ducks and geese are present. Interestingly, a large section of the lake is lacking any ducks but a muskrat or otter is present.

 

The area of interest is shown below:

Areas of interest would be:

  1. Prevalence of ducks at different light levels and temperature levels.
  2. The ratio of male to female ducks
  3. The choice of location made by the ducks.

 

I have kept my lab book digitally:

Observations_DraydenKopp

Blog post 9: Field Research Reflections

April 1st, 2018

Performing a successful field research project in the fall/winter time in Canada was a challenging task. My decision to perform my experiment indoors proved to be extremely difficult in meeting some of the requirements of this course. Elements such as creating a gradient from which to observe and record changes in my study was impossible as my experiment was performed in potted soil in a greenhouse. I certainly learned a lot about improvising and overcoming obstacles when growing my plants.

 

The biggest challenges I faced were time constraints as I have been dealing with medical issues, moving to a new country, and being a full-time university student in addition to completing this course. Due to these obstacles I did not make any major changes to my experimental design. That being said, I felt as though I did not have to make any changes because my design was relatively simple and straightforward. There was literature that both supported and did not support my hypothesis, so I was not overly worried about the outcome. Additionally, my passion is for geology and so I found it somewhat difficult to completely immerse myself in the world of ecology – but I’m thankful that I did.

 

My appreciation for ecological theory has certainly skyrocketed as I realize how much time, effort and practice it takes to create a “successful” experiment. Especially in researching the scientific articles for the annotated bibliography I have realized the passion people must have for ecology to perform experiments. Clarity of design and writing is such an essential element of research that I realized I need to improve greatly if I was to perform another ecological experiment. I certainly did learn a lot about crop production and the competition between crop and weed species.

 

Thanks for your wisdom and guidance throughout the course, Percy!

Blog Post 7: Theoretical Perspectives

In my field study, I am investigating the species composition of mosses occurring on differing slope positions on rock outcrops.  My hypothesis is that there will be different species of mosses growing in the different slope positions of the rock outcrops.  The ecological theory is that abiotic environmental factors vary with slope position, such as the slope, aspect, and substrate, which may affect the suitability of the habitat for each species.  Additional abiotic factors that may influence which species of moss will grow are the micro-climatic conditions, which is further influenced by the distance to the recently cleared forest edge and the resulting edge effect.  In addition, biotic factors such as interspecific competition and the cover of overstorey and understorey vegetation may also influence which species of moss will grow.  Each species may require a particular set of growing conditions or occupy a particular ecological niche, which thus influence where it will grow.

3 keywords are: mosses, rock outcrops, species composition

Tables and graphs

For my project I have decided to use graphs to represent a summary of my raw data. Because of my statistical tests used, I created a graph that shows the mean number of brush bushes per square meter at various elevations from the creek bottom. This graph shows the differences between the six elevations I compared.  When analyzing my data, I decided to remove the highest 6m counted because I only had ~6 samples. This made my comparisons a lot more representative of the un-paved study area. I used a bar graph, and feel like this is the best way to visually represent how the density of brush bushes changes as the height from the creek increases.

I will also include a table denoting the significant differences between elevation categories for the big sagebrush bushes. There were no significant differences in the rabbitbrush bushes across the different elevations, so I will just report that in my results section.

This data took me a long time to go through and figure out how best to analyze it. I chose an ANOVA over t-tests because they are a more powerful statistical test. I also compared the valley bush distribution to a Poisson distribution.

Blog Post 9: Field Research Reflections

Before starting this blog post I must admit that Ecology is not one of my strong spots. I am currently in my last semester of a Cellular, Molecular, Microbiology degree; therefore, I am more interested in the molecular process that occur. Because of this, I found this field project very difficult. With that being said, I think the majority of my difficulties rooted from not being as interested in this discipline of Biology.

I must say though, that I was able to learn a lot about trouble shooting and independent learning throughout this course and field project.

I had many time constraints, therefore, I decided to implement a study design that I was able to best understand. I found it easy to implement my study design and carry out the point counts. The hardest part of the field project for me was analyzing the data without using statistical tests. I found it difficult to compare my results with literature as my individual study was proceeded on such a small scale.

Overall, this class was able to open my eyes to another area of biology. I was able to determine different ways in which the ecological theory is developed; however, I still need lots more practice to facilitate my overall knowledge.

Blog 6 Data Collection

From the three tree categories (sheltered, partially sheltered, and exposed) 10 trees were randomly selected and examined for the presence of living moss. Data collection was on March 14 and started at 4:00 and finished at 5:30 when all 30 locations were examined, the weather was cloudy and slightly rainy that day. Currently the living moss present on the three different tree categories shows no significant different. Right now the presence of living moss seems to be fairly constant across the different categories. This goes against my hypothesis that there will be an increase of living moss on more sheltered trees. More research is needed to further determine the relation of living moss on different levels of exposed trees.

Blog Post 8: Tables and Graphs

The table I created included all of the data I collected over the five days. It was a summary of the various bird species abundance at each of the study sites. By producing a graph that summarizes all of the data collected, it enables for trends and patterns to be clearly outlined to draw conclusions from. However, from this data I found it to be confusing how to incorporate it into a graph to obtain a more visual demonstration of the species abundance over the three different sites.

Nevertheless, I noticed that each study site had different bird species associated with it. More specifically I noticed that each study site had a dominant species that inhabited the area. This was the outcome I was expecting, however, that leads to further questions such as why particular bird species favour one site over another? What is different about each site that a spatial gradient is created?

As a secondary research project it would be interesting to monitor the bird species and their migration patterns. Since the seasons are in the midst of changing the species abundance at each of the sites must also be changing; therefore, it would be interesting to determine which site the bird species favour as their migration patterns change. In addition, it would be interesting to see the displacement of the bird species as new birds migrate into the area. I’m assuming that depending on the bird species the migration patterns are different; therefore, if a smaller bird favoured a particular site it would be interesting to observe what would happen if a larger bird slowly started to inhabit the area.